(In)accuracy and convergent validity of daily end-of-day and single-time self-reported estimations of smartphone use among adolescents
Abstract
Overview
Understanding the measurement inaccuracy and bias introduced by self-reports of smartphone use is essential for making meaningful inferences about smartphone use and its effects. Evidence for the self-reports of smartphone use in intensive longitudinal studies is largely missing.
Study Design and Participants
Based on both self-reported and digital trace data from 137 Czech adolescents (41% girls, Mage = 14.95 years), this study examined the accuracy, directional bias, and convergent validity of:
- Daily end-of-day reports of screen time and phone-checking
- Single-time self-reports of the same behaviors
Findings
- Considerable discrepancies were found between self-reported smartphone use and digital trace data.
- There was low between-person convergent validity for all kinds of self-reports assessed.
- Respondents generally under-reported screen time and phone-checking frequency compared to digital tracking, whether reporting daily or one-time only.
- The within-person convergent validity between daily self-reports and digital tracking was low—meaning self-reports poorly captured day-to-day fluctuations in actual use.
Conclusion
- Self-report insights into smartphone usage differed considerably from digital trace data among adolescents.
- Both personal and situational factors contribute to explaining the gap between digital trace and self-report data.