Towards a Planetary Health Impact Assessment Framework: Exploring Expert Knowledge & Artificial Intelligence for RF-EMF Exposure Case-Study
Abstract
Overview
While recent World Health Organization (WHO) systematic reviews have extensively assessed the direct health effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure, the possible indirect impacts on human health through ecosystem disruption have remained unstudied. This gap prompted the proposal of a Planetary Health Impact Assessment (PHIA) approach, which integrates both direct and ecologically mediated exposure pathways.
Methods
This study explores the construction of a PHIA framework using knowledge graphs (KGs) to organize and visualize complex, interdisciplinary knowledge. The case study focused on RF-EMF exposure from mobile telecommunication technologies, utilizing both expert input and artificial intelligence (AI) tools that incorporate Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Deep Learning.
- Expert-based KGs were developed collaboratively with 12 specialists to hypothesize pathways linking RF-EMF exposure to direct and indirect health effects.
- The AI-based tool rapidly extracted and visualized information from scientific literature into KGs, though expert validation was necessary due to AI's limitations in precision and context.
Findings
- Experts jointly visualized pathways from RF-EMF exposure to direct health effects on organisms and indirect effects on humans via ecosystem disruption.
- AI-assisted KGs identified varying structures but require substantial human oversight for accuracy.
- The study found gaps in the literature, especially regarding ecological effects on pollinators, birds, and plants and subsequent impacts on human health.
- Data compiled: 97 publications on RF-EMF's potential effects on organisms/humans and 13 reviews on ecological consequences, resulting in 4215 unique direct association instances and 232 indirect.
- Visualization highlighted links between RF-EMF exposure, species diversity, community health of pollinators, and broader ecosystem services, connecting further to human health implications.
Conclusion
The expert-based knowledge graph serves as an organizer of available knowledge and a preliminary tool for PHIA development. AI tools show promise for enhancing exploratory analysis of literature, but human judgment remains irreplaceable for context-sensitive validation. The study underscores the potential for both direct and indirect health risks from electromagnetic fields, highlighting the need for further research into ecological and human health linkages.