Invited Perspective: Why Systematic Reviews, Scoping Reviews, and Evidence-to-Decision Frameworks Are Critical for Transparent, Consistent, Equitable, and Science-Based Decision-Making in Environmental Health

Authors: Chartres N, Joglekar R.

Year: 2024 Mar

Category: Environmental Health

Journal: Environ Health Perspect

DOI: 10.1289/EHP14346

URL: https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/EHP14346

Abstract

Overview

No abstract was provided for this study. The text discusses the critical role and challenges of systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence-to-decision frameworks in ensuring transparent, consistent, equitable, and scientific decision-making within the field of environmental health.

Excerpt Summary

The excerpt highlights concerns about the integrity of systematic reviews being undermined as regulatory bodies, such as the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), adopt these reviews in decision-making processes relative to the Toxic Substances Control Act. This misuse may overlook significant risks, particularly affecting vulnerable communities.

Key Points

  • Systematic reviews are essential for informed decision-making but are at risk of being compromised.
  • Agencies might not adhere to the rigorous standards required for such reviews.
  • Potential underestimation of risks from toxic exposures could harm marginalized groups.
systematic reviews scoping reviews evidence-to-decision environmental health decision-making
← Back to Stats