WIRELESS RADIATION HEALTH RISK! ⚠

The animal carcinogenicity evidence is no longer reasonably dismissible

Current status (November 2025):

This combination (same rare tumor types in two labs + environmental-level replication + non-monotonicity + human-relevant histology + shared driver mutations + high-certainty GRADE rating) is about as strong as animal evidence ever gets for a carcinogen before human epidemiology becomes unequivocal.

The old “NTP doses were unrealistically high” or “rat tumors are not relevant to humans” lines are no longer tenable in 2025.

2. The ion-forced-oscillation (IFO) / VGCC mechanism is mainstream biophysics, not fringe

Panagopoulos’ model is published in Scientific Reports (2015), Int J Oncol (2021), a CRC Press monograph (2022), and Frontiers in Public Health (2025). It is a straightforward application of known VGCC structure: polarized, ELF-modulated RF drives oscillatory forces on ions in the aqueous pores of voltage-gated channels, displacing the S4 arginine “gating charges” and adding timing noise to channel opening/closing.

Crucially, it predicts tissue selectivity exactly where the tumors appear: heart conduction system and Schwann cells, cranial nerves and glia, endocrine cells, all extremely rich in VGCCs and mitochondria/NOX. The model is still debated (no single-channel patch-clamp confirmation yet), but it is mathematically explicit, published in reputable journals, and correctly anticipates the organ pattern seen in NTP/Ramazzini.

3. Radical-pair / spin chemistry is established physics and now has direct human in-vivo corroboration

This is no longer theoretical; we now have real-time human ultrasound documentation of an acute, non-thermal biophysical change induced by ordinary phone-level fields.

“As of late 2025, two independent lifetime rodent studies using near-field and far-field exposures (NTP and Ramazzini) both find the same rare cancers (heart schwannomas and brain gliomas) with high-certainty evidence in a WHO-commissioned systematic review. The tumors show non-monotonic dose responses, appear at whole-body SARs as low as 0.1 W/kg, and the Ramazzini lesions share morphology and driver-gene mutations with low-grade human gliomas. Benchmark-dose modelling of the NTP data places sensitive endpoints at 0.2–0.4 W/kg, well below current phone limits. Polarized, modulated RF can couple into biology via two well-studied routes: (1) ion forced-oscillation disturbing S4 voltage-sensor timing in excitable tissues (Panagopoulos, Sci Rep 2015; Front Public Health 2025), and (2) radical-pair/spin effects in heme and flavin systems, now directly visualised as reversible RBC rouleaux in human veins within minutes of ordinary smartphone exposure (Brown & Biebrich, Front Cardiovasc Med 2025). The old thermal-only paradigm is no longer compatible with the totality of the evidence.”

Source

SAR Information & Resources

Discover RF Safe’s exclusive interactive charts to compare phone radiation levels, explore how children’s exposure differs from adults, and learn practical ways to lower RF exposure. Compare All Phones

Children & RF Exposure

Kids absorb more radiation due to thinner skulls. Learn how to protect them.

See Child Safety Data
Exclusive RF Safe Charts

Compare real-world radiation data in interactive charts found only here at RF Safe.

Explore Charts
Reduce Wi-Fi & Bluetooth

Turning off unused transmitters significantly lowers your exposure.

See the Difference
🍏 Apple

View SAR

📱 Google

View SAR

📲 Samsung

View SAR