WIRELESS RADIATION HEALTH RISK! ⚠

Cellular Goldilocks Zone

Berlin (Germany): long-range first, mass broadcast next

Moscow (USSR): national wiring + a new broadcast tower

Vienna (Austria): regular radio, then Asperger’s cohort

U.S. (Pittsburgh → Baltimore): broadcast boom before Kanner’s paper


What the alignment shows

 

Berlin (Germany): long‑range first, mass broadcast next

Why it matters for alignment: By 1920–1923 Berliners had both a powerful pre‑broadcast radio infrastructure and then regular entertainment broadcasting—years before the first child‑level descriptions elsewhere. The household electrification surge plausibly increased radio set adoption and exposure to urban electrical environments

Moscow (USSR): national wiring + a new broadcast tower

Why it matters for alignment: Moscow’s nation‑scale wiring and a flagship broadcast tower precede Sukhareva’s child cases by a few years, creating a crisp temporal sequence to analyze

Vienna (Austria): regular radio, then Asperger’s cohort

Why it matters for alignment: Vienna’s sustained broadcasting (from 1924) and subsequent high‑power upgrade (1933) predate Asperger’s 1938–1944 publications by about a decade. The city thus mirrors the “broadcast boom → clinical descriptions” order seen elsewhere.

United States (Pittsburgh → Baltimore): broadcast boom before Kanner’s paper

Why it matters for alignment: U.S. broadcasting takes off in the early 1920s; urban electrification is widespread by ~1930; Kanner’s Baltimore cohort crystallizes in the late 1930s–early 1940s—again a lag of roughly a decade from broadcast takeoff to child‑level descriptions. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond+1

What it shows. In Berlin and Moscow, high‑power transmitting capacity (1906–1922) and regular entertainment broadcasting (1920–1924) precede the first autism‑like, child‑specific case descriptions (1925/26) by a few years. In the U.S. and Vienna, the 1920–1924 broadcast takeoff and broad urban electrification by ~1930 precede Kanner’s (1938–43) and Asperger’s (1938–44) cohorts by about a decade. That’s a clean geo‑temporal alignment

I’m not trying to litigate causation from century‑old records.  I’m framing a clear, precautionary thesis: modern “hertzification”, a Schumann cavity pumped full of entropic waste, has nudged biology outside its cellular Goldilocks zone, and once communication inside living tissue is perturbed, especially during critical windows, it can be hard (or impossible) to re‑stabilize the original set‑points. Co‑factors matter; the claim is alignment + plausibility, not monocausal certainty.

Source

SAR Information & Resources

Discover RF Safe’s exclusive interactive charts to compare phone radiation levels, explore how children’s exposure differs from adults, and learn practical ways to lower RF exposure. Compare All Phones

Children & RF Exposure

Kids absorb more radiation due to thinner skulls. Learn how to protect them.

See Child Safety Data
Exclusive RF Safe Charts

Compare real-world radiation data in interactive charts found only here at RF Safe.

Explore Charts
Reduce Wi-Fi & Bluetooth

Turning off unused transmitters significantly lowers your exposure.

See the Difference
🍏 Apple

View SAR

📱 Google

View SAR

📲 Samsung

View SAR