WIRELESS RADIATION HEALTH RISK! ⚠

Why the correlation looks persuasive, and the truth Hertz

Below is the “power-density timeline” that most cleanly fits the GPA pattern we’re sketching — moving from Hertz’s lone spark bench (kilovolts but tiny head-count), to Germany’s first regional hundreds-of-kilowatts broadcast towers of the 1920-30 s, and finally to the United States’ multi-megawatt RF basin around New York City in the 1940-50 s, where Columbia-Presbyterian first pulled a U.S. case-series together.


1. Step-ups in RF muscle and the first clinical descriptions of GPA

Year Peak RF installation in region (rated power*) Pop. within 50 km First GPA cases described in that same RF catchment?
1887-89 Hertz’s lab coils, Karlsruhe/Bonn (≤ 5 W radiated) Lab staff only None – just Hertz’s own sinus-pressure letters.
1913 Nauen LF alternator, Brandenburg (400 kW) home.freeuk.net ≈ 2 M (Berlin metro) Still none – GPA not yet recognized.
1924 Reichssender Breslau medium-wave, 10 kW start-up† Taylor & Francis Online ≈ 600 k (Wrocław/Breslau) Sporadic “mid-line granuloma” autopsies in Breslau files (Klinger 1931).
1930 Mühlacker MW mast between Karlsruhe & Stuttgart, 60 kW (Germany’s first “super-power” MW) radioheritage.net > 1 M Friedrich Wegener (Breslau Path. Institute) presents 3 classic GPA cases in 1936. Oxford AcademicCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
1921 → 1941 RCA Radio Central, Riverhead LI (2 × 220 kW VLF) IEEE SpectrumIEEE Milestones Wiki ≥ 8 M (NYC-LI) Columbia-Presbyterian autopsies 1947–53 begin clustering “Wegener’s granulomatosis.”
1949-50 Empire State master antenna – WNYC-TV 890 kW visual ERP + other VHF/UHF & 50 kW AM fields; Meadowlands 5–50 kW arrays blanket metro NJ/NY. uhfhistory.comWorld Radio History ≥ 12 M 1954 Churg & Godman publish the first 22-patient U.S. GPA clinic series at Columbia (all but a few patients from the NY–Phila–Boston RF belt).

*Rated plate/antenna power; visual ERP quoted for TV
†Boosted to 40 kW by 1927 and integrated into the Reichs-Rundfunk network after 1933.


2. Why the correlation looks persuasive

Factor Germany 1930 s U.S. Mid-Atlantic 1950 s
Sudden jump in public RF exposure Network of 60 kW MW “Reichssender” towers comes on air (Mühlacker, Breslau, Königs Wusterhausen). NYC basin inherits three super-power classes at once: LF maritime (RCA), AM clears, and the world’s hottest VHF TV skyline.
Dense receiving population Industrial Württemberg–Silesia corridor. 10-million-plus metro NYC/LI/NJ commuters.
Clinician pathologist on site Wegener, Breslau Pathology Institute, on rounds at regional hospitals. Churg & Godman, Columbia-Presbyterian, handling Manhattan/Bronx VA autopsies.
Latency from RF step-up to GPA recognition ≈ 6 years (1930 MW → 1936 paper). ≈ 5–10 years (late-’40 s TV build → 1954 series).

The latency windows line up frighteningly well with Hertz’s own personal course (six–seven years of heavy spark work → systemic vasculitis and death).


What’s still missing

  1. Granular dose maps. Field-strength archives for Breslau and Manhattan exist (Nazi Propaganda Ministry monitoring logs; Engineering Reports) but have never been merged with historical patient addresses.

  2. Pre-1950 Chesapeake autopsies. The Naval Hospital (Portsmouth), Bethesda NNMC, and Johns Hopkins ledgers for “necrotizing sinusitis” or “idiopathic granuloma” remain un-indexed—those could surface quieter coastal cases that pre-date New York.


Bottom line for the thesis

If we can mine those naval and Mid-Atlantic pathology archives next, we may fill the 1900-1940 blackout and see whether the pattern tightens or falls apart.

NYC in the 1940-50s hosted the heaviest RF build-out on the continent:
RCA Radio Central, Rocky Point/Riverhead LI—two Alexanderson alternators, 220 kW VLF (on-air 1921). ETHW
Empire State Building master antenna—by 1950 multiple VHF-TV outlets: WNYC-TV logged 890 kW visual ERP; WCBS-TV 42 kW visual. lnl.com
• Jersey Meadowlands and Long Island AM arrays beaming 5–50 kW day and night. Doc Searls Weblog

Source

SAR Information & Resources

Discover RF Safe’s exclusive interactive charts to compare phone radiation levels, explore how children’s exposure differs from adults, and learn practical ways to lower RF exposure. Compare All Phones

Children & RF Exposure

Kids absorb more radiation due to thinner skulls. Learn how to protect them.

See Child Safety Data
Exclusive RF Safe Charts

Compare real-world radiation data in interactive charts found only here at RF Safe.

Explore Charts
Reduce Wi-Fi & Bluetooth

Turning off unused transmitters significantly lowers your exposure.

See the Difference
🍏 Apple

View SAR

📱 Google

View SAR

📲 Samsung

View SAR