The Easy Target vs. the Real Wolf
Big Pharma deserves scrutiny. Always has. But if we stop there, we miss the bigger story—the one that actually shapes our children’s daily environment.
Pharma sells treatments. Wireless sells exposure.
One industry is grilled on Capitol Hill for every pill and label. The other blankets homes and classrooms with pulsed microwave radiation under exposure limits written when beepers were cutting‑edge. And thanks to federal preemption from 1996, communities are still barred from saying “No” to towers on health grounds—even for schools.
That’s not oversight. That’s capture.
The Distraction Play
Politicians love “visible wins.” Lately, that’s school phone bans. I understand the appeal—phones do distract learning. But let’s be honest: a ban doesn’t touch the main exposure kids live under all day long—cell towers near school grounds, high‑power access points in hallways, and home routers running 24/7.
It’s the telecom version of the tobacco playbook: focus attention on what kids do with the product, not what the product does to kids. Take the phone out of a child’s hand and call it a victory—while the tower at the fence line keeps humming.
I’m not speaking in abstractions. My seven‑year‑old’s classroom is 465 feet from a tower. No “off and away” rule changes that signal, and no parent should be forced to accept it.
What Changed in the Science—and What Didn’t Change in Policy
Over the last decade, large, conservative toxicology programs and lifetime animal studies have converged on the same tumor types seen with chronic RF exposure. Independent reviews have strengthened signals in cancer and male fertility. None of that is reflected in the heat‑only exposure limits the United States still uses.
In 2021, a federal court told the FCC its decision to keep 1990s‑era limits was “arbitrary and capricious” because it ignored evidence on things like neurological effects, reproductive harms, children’s susceptibility, and long‑term exposures. That remand should have been a turning point.
Instead, we’re still pretending the only thing RF can do is heat tissue.
Meanwhile, the federal research program that actually found cancer signals was allowed to wither. Imagine if we stopped drug safety research the year a worrisome signal appeared—then said “no new evidence” as the reason to keep old rules. That’s where wireless stands today.
Why Big Pharma Is the Easy Target—and Wireless the Real Wolf
-
Visibility vs. invisibility. Pharma risks are visible: pills, labels, inserts, and clinical trials. Wireless risks are invisible radiation fields occupying every room. What we don’t see, we tend to excuse.
-
Oversight vs. self‑policing. Pharma is hemmed in by FDA processes, post‑market surveillance, black‑box warnings, REMS programs, and constant litigation. Wireless leans on an FCC framework that treats biology as a thermostat and communities as a nuisance.
-
Public narrative. “Drug companies hurt people” is a familiar story. “Microwave infrastructure harms biology below heating thresholds” is a mouthful—and exactly why it’s been easy to sideline.
If you’re serious about children’s health, you can’t keep punching the easy target and letting the real wolf roam.
A Message for Secretary Kennedy
For years, you told families what I’ve told mine: don’t keep a phone to a child’s head or in a pocket; be cautious with chronic exposures. You backed the legal challenges that pressured Washington to look seriously at non‑thermal biology. Now, as the person holding the keys at HHS, the MAHA blueprint under your watch barely glances at the new science, tiptoes past known sponsorship bias, and offers a school phone ban as proof of action.
Banning children isn’t protection. It’s deflection.
Leadership means fixing the standards, the siting, and the technology—not telling kids to be better behaved under outdated rules.
What Real Protection Looks Like (A “Clean Ether” Platform)
-
Restart the science. Restore and expand an independent federal research program (mechanisms, chronic exposure, children’s susceptibility), with conflict‑of‑interest firewalls, regular public updates, and a charter that explicitly evaluates non‑thermal endpoints.
-
Finish the court‑ordered homework. Update national exposure policy to reflect modern evidence: non‑monotonic effects, modulation, pulsing, and multi‑source environments—not just heat in a dummy head.
-
Give communities their voice back. Reform the 1996 preemption so schools and towns can set prudent setbacks near playgrounds and bedrooms without being sued into silence.
-
Fix exposure where kids actually are. Wire classrooms by default; adopt light‑based wireless (Li‑Fi) for mobility indoors; reserve RF for what truly requires it. This lowers ambient exposure while improving network performance.
-
Make “safe mode” the default for school devices. Geofenced profiles that minimize high‑duty‑cycle radios indoors, with wired accessories standardized and airplane‑mode policies that stick.
-
Modernize compliance. Move beyond single‑device SAR to real‑world, cumulative exposure assessment in places children spend time. Audit buildings the way we audit air and water.
This isn’t anti‑technology. It’s pro‑child, pro‑science, and pro‑innovation. We can build brilliant networks without marinating kids in 1990s assumptions.
Bottom Line
“Cracking down on Big Pharma” plays well on TV. But if we keep hunting easy prey while the wolf guards the sheep, nothing changes.
-
Pharma sells the cure; wireless sells the cause.
-
Pharma is watched; wireless is waved through.
-
Pharma gets scrutiny; wireless needs regulation.
Fight the cause, scrutinize the cure. Our children deserve nothing less.