They’re Testing the Wrong Thing
The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) just unveiled a new, taxpayer-funded RF radiation testing system. On paper, it sounds impressive — a modern exposure chamber, capable of running precise, controlled experiments.
But here’s the dirty truth: they’ve tuned it to test the same outdated frequencies we’ve already studied for decades — 900 MHz and 1,900 MHz. Those are the old 2G and 3G cell phone bands, relics of the 1990s and early 2000s. And every time they’ve been studied long-term, the results have been the same: they cause harm.
The U.S. National Toxicology Program’s multi-year studies already linked these bands to malignant brain tumors and malignant heart tumors in male rats. The World Health Organization just reaffirmed these findings in 2025 with high certainty — meaning no new evidence is likely to change the conclusion.
So why, when we already know the outcome, is NIEHS spending years re-testing these same old bands?
Because it’s safe for them politically. It won’t rock the boat. It won’t anger the wireless industry. And it gives the illusion of progress without threatening the status quo.
The Real Threat: 600 MHz and Beyond
While NIEHS busies itself with 20-year-old frequencies, your body is being bathed in something they aren’t even looking at: the 600 MHz band.
This isn’t science fiction. 600 MHz is already in use for nationwide 5G coverage. President Trump himself called for expanding it in the One Big Beautiful Bill, telling Congress to “put 600 MHz in the bill” so more spectrum could be freed for auction.
Here’s why it matters: 600 MHz has the deepest penetration of any frequency ever used in telecom at this scale. It travels farther, goes through walls — and through you — more easily than 900 MHz or 1,900 MHz. That means it reaches deep tissues: bone marrow, reproductive organs, even inner brain structures. It targets areas those older bands could never reach as effectively.
And yet — there is zero long-term toxicology research on 600 MHz in living systems. None. Not in animals. Not in people.
This Is How They Stall
Re-testing 900 MHz and 1,900 MHz is not “future-proofing science.” It’s a stalling tactic — and it’s been used before.
In the early 2000s, when evidence was mounting that wireless radiation caused non-thermal biological effects, regulators stuck to their 1996 FCC guidelines based on 1950s-era heat injury models. They demanded “more study” while doing nothing about the exposures people were already getting. That delay has now cost us 30 years.
Now they’re doing it again. While they test yesterday’s technology, today’s (and tomorrow’s) technology will run wild, with no safety data, no protective limits, and no accountability.
By the time they even start studying 600 MHz — if they ever do — an entire generation will have lived its whole life under 24/7 exposure.
We Must Reverse This — Now
If NIEHS and NIH were acting in the public’s interest, they would:
-
Retune these chambers for 600 MHz immediately.
-
Replicate the National Toxicology Program’s cancer protocol for 600 MHz using real 5G signals, not theoretical waveforms.
-
Begin multi-generational studies to see how deep-penetrating RF affects fertility, child development, neurological health, and cancer risk.
-
Demand that the FCC suspend further low-band expansion until this safety data exists.
Instead, they are wasting years proving what we already know: that 900 MHz and 1,900 MHz are dangerous. Meanwhile, they willfully ignore the band that could prove to be even more damaging — and is already in full deployment.
This Is Not Acceptable
It is unacceptable for public health agencies to “play catch-up” when the stakes are generational.
It is unacceptable to let an entire nation be exposed to a new, deeper-penetrating RF frequency without first understanding the risks.
It is unacceptable to spend public money on politically safe, scientifically redundant tests while pretending that’s protecting anyone.
Every American deserves to know the truth: we are being used as unconsenting participants in the largest biological experiment in history — an experiment with no control group, no informed consent, and no plan for stopping if the results turn out deadly.
The Bottom Line
We already know 900 MHz and 1,900 MHz cause harm. Testing them again changes nothing — except the clock, which runs out while 600 MHz blankets the country.
If we do not demand 600 MHz testing now, before another decade passes, the question will no longer be “does it cause harm?” but “how much harm have we already done?”
This isn’t just bad science — it’s a betrayal of the public trust. And it’s happening right now.