<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>The Telecommunications Act of 1996 | * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rfsafe.com/tag/the-telecommunications-act-of-1996/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/tag/the-telecommunications-act-of-1996/</link>
	<description>Information On Smartphone Radiation Levels And Cell Phone Radiation Mitigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 03:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74557350</site>	<item>
		<title>Why the Misclassification of RF Health Risks Must End and Regulations Must Evolve</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/why-the-misclassification-of-rf-health-risks-must-end-and-regulations-must-evolve/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 02:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Telecommunications Act of 1996]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rfsafe.com/?p=133028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue of radiofrequency (RF) health risk misclassification is no longer a matter of scientific debate, but rather a pressing policy concern. The original regulations, particularly The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA), must be updated to reflect our current understanding of RF emissions’ health effects. While the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established Specific Absorption Rate [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/why-the-misclassification-of-rf-health-risks-must-end-and-regulations-must-evolve/">Why the Misclassification of RF Health Risks Must End and Regulations Must Evolve</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">133028</post-id>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
