<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>The Telecommunications Act of 1996 | * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rfsafe.com/tag/the-telecommunications-act-of-1996/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/tag/the-telecommunications-act-of-1996/</link>
	<description>Information On Smartphone Radiation Levels And Cell Phone Radiation Mitigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 03:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74557350</site>	<item>
		<title>Why the Misclassification of RF Health Risks Must End and Regulations Must Evolve</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/why-the-misclassification-of-rf-health-risks-must-end-and-regulations-must-evolve/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 02:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Telecommunications Act of 1996]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rfsafe.com/?p=133028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue of radiofrequency (RF) health risk misclassification is no longer a matter of scientific debate, but rather a pressing policy concern. The original regulations, particularly The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA), must be updated to reflect our current understanding of RF emissions&#8217; health effects. While the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established Specific Absorption Rate [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/why-the-misclassification-of-rf-health-risks-must-end-and-regulations-must-evolve/">Why the Misclassification of RF Health Risks Must End and Regulations Must Evolve</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">133028</post-id>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
