<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Specific Absorption Rate | * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rfsafe.com/tag/specific-absorption-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/tag/specific-absorption-rate/</link>
	<description>Information On Smartphone Radiation Levels And Cell Phone Radiation Mitigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74557350</site>	<item>
		<title>Why RF Safe Makes a Case: Teaching the Industry How to Do It Right</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/why-rf-safe-makes-a-case-teaching-the-industry-how-to-do-it-right/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antenna Interference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-radiation Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chronic Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DefenderShield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electromagnetic radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misleading Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuantaCase™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-World Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SafeSleeve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rfsafe.com/?p=145208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At RF Safe, we don’t just manufacture a phone case—we provide a blueprint for how to design the safest possible anti-radiation case. Our open-source approach isn’t about dominating the market; it’s about educating consumers and manufacturers on how to do it right. The Problem with Most “Anti-Radiation” Cases Many so-called “anti-radiation” cases can actually increase [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/why-rf-safe-makes-a-case-teaching-the-industry-how-to-do-it-right/">Why RF Safe Makes a Case: Teaching the Industry How to Do It Right</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">145208</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Find Lowest Radiation (SAR Level) Cell Phones Sold in USA</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/lowest-radiation-cell-phones-sold-usa/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=610</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Compare Cell Phone Radiation  Option 1:  Phone SAR By Model List Option 2: Compare SAR Levels Side By Side –  Click Here Option 3: Use the dropdown menus below to select the SAR test position to update the SAR ranking list below Spot FAKE radiation protection   Lowest Specific Absorption Rate levels What About The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/lowest-radiation-cell-phones-sold-usa/">Find Lowest Radiation (SAR Level) Cell Phones Sold in USA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">610</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/m6m5b7JlygQ" duration="291">
			<media:player url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/m6m5b7JlygQ" />
			<media:title type="html">Find Lowest Radiation (SAR Level) Cell Phones Sold in USA</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">Find Lowest Radiation (SAR Level) Cell Phones Sold in USA</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/m6m5b7jlygq.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>Cell Phone SAR,FCC,Specific Absorption Rate,lowest radiation cell phones</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holiday 2023 Warning: Don&#8217;t Gift Wrap Brain Cancer! Smartphones, Kids and Cancer</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/smartphones-blackfriday-2023-gift-wrapping-brain-cancer-studies-link-smartphones-and-cancer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 05:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airtube headset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Brain Barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=19267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>IMPORTANT HOLIDAY SMARTPHONE WARNINGS!MICROWAVE RADIATION HEALTH HAZARDS!The kickoff for endless 2023 Black Friday and Cyber Monday Smartphone deals has begun.  However, you need to know that several of the world’s largest studies have found links to smartphone radiation and cancer.  Now, the newest study in the USA by the NTP (National Toxicology Program) found such [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/smartphones-blackfriday-2023-gift-wrapping-brain-cancer-studies-link-smartphones-and-cancer/">Holiday 2023 Warning: Don&#8217;t Gift Wrap Brain Cancer! Smartphones, Kids and Cancer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19267</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HdnZXSj9vcw" duration="980">
			<media:player url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HdnZXSj9vcw" />
			<media:title type="html">Holiday 2023 Warning: Don&#039;t Gift Wrap Brain Cancer! Smartphones, Kids and Cancer * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">IMPORTANT HOLIDAY SMARTPHONE WARNINGS!MICROWAVE RADIATION HEALTH HAZARDS!The kickoff for endless 2023 Black Friday and Cyber Monday Smartphone deals has begun.  However, you need to know that several of the world&#039;s largest studies have found links to smartphone radiation and cancer.  Now, the newest</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/hdnzxsj9vcw.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>Airtube headset,Black Friday,Blood Brain Barrier,Cell Phone Radiation,Health Effects,medical studies,SAR Levels,Specific Absorption Rate,black friday</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler Confronted Over Cell Phone Radiation In Silicon Valley</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/fcc-chairman-tom-wheeler-confronted-cell-phone-radiation-silicon-valley/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dna and the Microwave Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=1266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FLASHBACK – Captured Agency For Two Decades – FCC The link between cell phone radiation and cancer is a topic of ongoing concern, with activists and scientists alike calling for increased regulations and warning labels on devices. In a recent incident, activists in California confronted Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Tom Wheeler during a speech [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/fcc-chairman-tom-wheeler-confronted-cell-phone-radiation-silicon-valley/">FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler Confronted Over Cell Phone Radiation In Silicon Valley</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1266</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/DTF-c7VNe9Q" duration="251">
			<media:player url="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/DTF-c7VNe9Q" />
			<media:title type="html">FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler Confronted Over Cell Phone Radiation In Silicon Valley * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">FLASHBACK - Captured Agency For Two Decades - FCC The link between cell phone radiation and cancer is a topic of ongoing concern, with activists and scientists alike calling for increased regulations and warning labels on devices. In a recent incident, activists in California confronted Federal Comm</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/fcc-chairman-tom-wheeler-confronted-over-cell-phone-radiation-in-silicon-valley-rf-radio-frequency-safe.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>Cell Phone Cancer,Cell Phone Radiation,Dna and the Microwave Effect,FCC,Specific Absorption Rate,tom wheeler</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study:Proof Cell Phone Radiation Exacerbates Disease In Which Inflammation Is An Etiologic Factor</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/studyproof-cell-phone-radiation-exacerbates-disease-inflammation-etiologic-factor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 08:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=6499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Millions of people around the world are becoming increasingly sensitive to radio frequency radiation;  often manifesting itself as pain and mild inflammation (Latin, īnflammō, “I ignite, set alight”) brought on through the complex biological response of vascular tissues as a result of harmful man-made stimuli — such as stressed or damaged cells from exposure to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/studyproof-cell-phone-radiation-exacerbates-disease-inflammation-etiologic-factor/">Study:Proof Cell Phone Radiation Exacerbates Disease In Which Inflammation Is An Etiologic Factor</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6499</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell Phone Radiation Right-To-Know Ordinance Unanimously Passes In Berkeley CA</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/cellphone-radiation-right-to-know-ordinance-unanimously-passes-in-berkeley-ca/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 10:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right To Know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=32631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>DID YOU KNOW? The Federal Communication Commission recommends keeping your cell phone 5 to 25 millimeters away from your body, depending on the model, to limit radio frequency exposure to safe levels. A new law in USA will require this WARNING on cell phones: “If you carry or use your phone in a pants or [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/cellphone-radiation-right-to-know-ordinance-unanimously-passes-in-berkeley-ca/">Cell Phone Radiation Right-To-Know Ordinance Unanimously Passes In Berkeley CA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">32631</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Call Saul Brother Chuck McGill Suffers From RF Radiation (EHS) Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/better-call-saul-brother-chuck-mcgill-suffers-rf-radiation-ehs-electromagnetic-hypersensitivity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 04:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Better Call Saul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck McGill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saul Goodman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=29357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>[pullquote]When you learn the true story of how wireless microwave radiation took the life of Jimmy Gonzalez, a brilliant Florida Attorney who in real life lost his battle with three different cell phone induced cancers on November 27, 2014 –RIP Jimmy — Chuck McGill doesn’t sound crazy anymore.[/pullquote] A hot new topic of confusion has [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/better-call-saul-brother-chuck-mcgill-suffers-rf-radiation-ehs-electromagnetic-hypersensitivity/">Better Call Saul Brother Chuck McGill Suffers From RF Radiation (EHS) Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29357</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Florida Attorney Die From 3 Different Cell Phone Induced Cancers?</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/florida-attorney-dies-3-different-cell-phone-induced-cancers-brain-cancer-hand-and-chest/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 00:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Brain Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Hand Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pembroke Pines Fl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=29330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Brain Cancer /Hand Cancer/Aorta Cancer Sadly, Florida Attorney Jimmy Gonzalez has succumbed to several DIFFERENT cancers ALL caused by cell phone radiation exposure! EACH CANCER WAS EXACTLY WHERE HIS CELL PHONE WAS HELD CLOSE TO HIS BODY! Since Jimmy’s warning about cell phones causing GBM (Glioblastoma) brain tumors, there is a rapidly growing list of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/florida-attorney-dies-3-different-cell-phone-induced-cancers-brain-cancer-hand-and-chest/">Did Florida Attorney Die From 3 Different Cell Phone Induced Cancers?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29330</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lzOjK6PHUas" duration="72">
			<media:player url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lzOjK6PHUas" />
			<media:title type="html">Did Florida Attorney Die From 3 Different Cell Phone Induced Cancers? * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">Brain Cancer /Hand Cancer/Aorta Cancer Sadly, Florida Attorney Jimmy Gonzalez has succumbed to several DIFFERENT cancers ALL caused by cell phone radiation exposure! EACH CANCER WAS EXACTLY WHERE HIS CELL PHONE WAS HELD CLOSE TO HIS BODY! Since Jimmy&#039;s warning about cell phones causing GBM (Glioblas</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/lzojk6phuas.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>Cell Phone Brain Cancer,Cell Phone Hand Cancer,Cell Phone Radiation,Cell Phone SAR,Jimmy Gonzalez,Pembroke Pines Fl,SAR Levels,Specific Absorption Rate</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Cooley LLP Law Firm Defending Pong Case SAR Test Putting Your Children and Babies Lives at Risk?</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/is-cooley-llp-law-firm-defending-pong-case-sar-test-putting-your-children-and-babies-lives-at-risk/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 15:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone radiation lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooley LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC TEST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Willsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pong Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR TEST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=27251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>People Before Profits! RF Safe Case vs Pong Case Lawyers Don’t trust your health to products you can’t test yourself!   Be RF Safe to be sure! Anyone telling you that SAR levels are designed to protect your children when using a cell phone has LIED to you! Large investment bankers have backed Pong with [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/is-cooley-llp-law-firm-defending-pong-case-sar-test-putting-your-children-and-babies-lives-at-risk/">Is Cooley LLP Law Firm Defending Pong Case SAR Test Putting Your Children and Babies Lives at Risk?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27251</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berkeley Votes On &#8220;Right To Know&#8221; Cell Phone Warning Ordinance</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/oct-28th-berkeley-votes-right-know-cell-phone-warning-ordinance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 05:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right To Know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=11498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: Cell phone Radiation Right-To-Know Ordinance Unanimously Passes In Berkeley CA May 13, 2015 The city of Berkeley’s proposed ordinance isn’t about debating the role that cell phones play in the causation of cancer and other medical disorders.  The fact that biologists can demonstrate that electromagnetic radiation generated by cellular phones has biological effects that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/oct-28th-berkeley-votes-right-know-cell-phone-warning-ordinance/">Berkeley Votes On &#8220;Right To Know&#8221; Cell Phone Warning Ordinance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11498</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berkeley CA Ready For Legal Fight Over Cell Phone Warning Label Law</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/berkeley-ca-ready-for-legal-fight-over-cell-phone-warning-label-law/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 08:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone warning labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Warnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=6433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On Oct. 28, 2014 the Berkeley City Council will consider legislation that could make it the first U.S. city to require retailers to warn consumers that radiation from cell phones may be hazardous to their health. Mounting evidence suggests that cell phone use could increase the risk of brain tumors, breast cancer, and male infertility. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/berkeley-ca-ready-for-legal-fight-over-cell-phone-warning-label-law/">Berkeley CA Ready For Legal Fight Over Cell Phone Warning Label Law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6433</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone 6 SAR Nearly Exceeds Legal Radiation Limits for Simultaneous Rating</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/simultaneous-rating-iphone-6-sar-nearly-exceeds-legal-radiation-limits/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 6 Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 7 Plus SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 7 SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=6050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Apple’s iPhone 6 Plus is bigger, but bigger is absolutely no excuse for Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) radiation exposure levels that are only .01 under the FCC’s legal limit of 1.6 watts per kilogram (W/kg). It’s easy to dismiss Apple’s new iPhone 6 Plus as merely catching up to Android in size, but Apple is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/simultaneous-rating-iphone-6-sar-nearly-exceeds-legal-radiation-limits/">iPhone 6 SAR Nearly Exceeds Legal Radiation Limits for Simultaneous Rating</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6050</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human Cell Phone and WiFi Radiation Experiments Violate Nuremberg Treaty</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/human-cell-phone-wi-fi-radiation-experiments-violate-nuremberg-treaty/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=5441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Scientist Barry Trower has announced that the telecommunications industry, with the cooperation of governments around the world, is violating the Nuremberg treaty by allowing human experimentation on a global scale. Long after Hitler’s death, inside the industrial complexes of the most valued corporations on earth — the tradition of violating human rights for global domination [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/human-cell-phone-wi-fi-radiation-experiments-violate-nuremberg-treaty/">Human Cell Phone and WiFi Radiation Experiments Violate Nuremberg Treaty</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5441</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slate.com&#8217;s Apocalyptical Writer Philip Plait Ushers In Death By Leaving Wireless Radiation Out Of Doomsday Scenario</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/slate-coms-apocalyptical-writer-philip-plait-ushers-in-death-by-leaving-wireless-cell-phone-radiation-out-of-doomsday-scenario/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Bilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Plait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=30721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Phil Plait writes Slate’s Bad Astronomy blog @BadAstronomer which amounts to very bad science as well.  This self proclaiming evangelizer of death, and author of Death From the Skies seems to cunningly look forward to your children dying of cancer like the devil himself disguised as a grim reaper. At least that’s the only way [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/slate-coms-apocalyptical-writer-philip-plait-ushers-in-death-by-leaving-wireless-cell-phone-radiation-out-of-doomsday-scenario/">Slate.com&#8217;s Apocalyptical Writer Philip Plait Ushers In Death By Leaving Wireless Radiation Out Of Doomsday Scenario</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">30721</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Get Played By Pong Cases Cell Phone Radiation is No Game</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/dont-get-played-pong-cases-cell-phone-radiation-game/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pong Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=4577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ElectricSense’s Lloyd Burrell asks the question, “Cell Phone Radiation Protection – Do Pong Cases Work?” Continue reading for the Answer! UPDATE: Smartphones Do Cause Cancer – U.S. Government Expected To Advise Public of Health Risk 5/26/2016 Cellphone Radiation Is No Game! RF Safe Case vs Pong Case Lawyers – People Before Profits! Is Cooley LLP [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/dont-get-played-pong-cases-cell-phone-radiation-game/">Don&#8217;t Get Played By Pong Cases Cell Phone Radiation is No Game</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4577</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Bluetooth Radiation as Dangerous as Cell Phone Radiation?</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/bluetooth-radiation-dangerous-cell-phone-radiation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Brain Barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bluetooth Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=4336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Is Bluetooth Radiation Dangerous? Bluetooth radiation has been even less studied than cell phone radiation. The lack of formal studies has enabled the ‘experts’ to claim that Bluetooth radiation is safe. This claim is based not on research proving Bluetooth radiation safe but rather on a lack of studies proving it unsafe, which is changing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/bluetooth-radiation-dangerous-cell-phone-radiation/">Is Bluetooth Radiation as Dangerous as Cell Phone Radiation?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4336</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royal Decree Prohibits Selling Children Under 7 Cell Phones Amid Radiation Concerns</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/royal-decree-prohibits-selling-children-7-cell-phones-amid-radiation-concerns/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=4225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Royal Decree is showing the world that America is lagging far behind with respect to establishing proper safety regulations to protect its population (especially young children) from a greedy monolithic wireless industry. Click here to see just how bad America has lost the checks and balances between the government agencies design to protect the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/royal-decree-prohibits-selling-children-7-cell-phones-amid-radiation-concerns/">Royal Decree Prohibits Selling Children Under 7 Cell Phones Amid Radiation Concerns</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4225</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Glass Radiation: Health Risk from Wearable Wireless SAR Levels Exceed Smartphones</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/google-glass-radiation-health-risk-from-wearable-wireless-sar-levels-exceed-smartphones/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Brain Barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=3906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Google Glass emits more wireless radiation than most cell phones on the market, but unlike cell phone users, Glass users may be wearing this device on their heads for more than 12 hours a day putting their health at risk. Apr. 15, 2014 – BERKELEY, Calif. — The Google Glass emits both Wi-Fi and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/google-glass-radiation-health-risk-from-wearable-wireless-sar-levels-exceed-smartphones/">Google Glass Radiation: Health Risk from Wearable Wireless SAR Levels Exceed Smartphones</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3906</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR &#8211; FCC Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/specific-absorption-rate-sar-fcc-cell-phone-radiation-exposure-limits/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=1375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Looking for how to find the Specific Absorption Rate of your Smartphone? It doesn’t get any easier than this. Simply enter your FCC ID below (include dashes when applicable) FCC CELLULAR VALUES: Head SAR Levels – Body SAR –  Hotspot SAR FCC SIMULTANEOUS VALUES:  Head SAR  –  Body SAR  –  Hotspot SAR Enter the Phone’s FCC ID: Popular smartphones [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/specific-absorption-rate-sar-fcc-cell-phone-radiation-exposure-limits/">Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR &#8211; FCC Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1375</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xTj_W1sIqfs" duration="286">
			<media:player url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xTj_W1sIqfs" />
			<media:title type="html">Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR - FCC Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">Looking for how to find the Specific Absorption Rate of your Smartphone? It doesn&#039;t get any easier than this. Simply enter your FCC ID below (include dashes when applicable) FCC CELLULAR VALUES: Head SAR Levels - Body SAR -  Hotspot SAR FCC SIMULTANEOUS VALUES:  Head SAR  -  Body SAR  -  Hotspot SAR</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/xtj_w1siqfs.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>Cell Phone SAR,SAR Levels,Specific Absorption Rate,sar</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RF Safe Reminds Parents That Radiation from Cell Phones is Possibly Carcinogenic for Children</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/rf-safe-reminds-parents-radiation-cell-phones-possibly-carcinogenic-children/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 08:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airtube headset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Brain Barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=1005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>RF Safe announces concerns over millions of children using smart phones around the world without understanding the health risk of cancer from exposure to cell phone radiation. Palo Alto, CA (PRWEB) December 27, 2013 RF Safe is concerned that the general public is not aware of the potential health hazards from exposure to cell phone [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/rf-safe-reminds-parents-radiation-cell-phones-possibly-carcinogenic-children/">RF Safe Reminds Parents That Radiation from Cell Phones is Possibly Carcinogenic for Children</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1005</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RF Safe Supports Breast Cancer Awareness “No Phone Bra Zone” Cell Phone Radiation Safety</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/rf-safe-supports-breast-cancer-awareness-phone-bra-zone-cell-phone-radiation-safety/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone radiation shield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pocket shield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Strong anecdotal evidence of breast cancer in young women from exposure to non-ionizing levels of cell phone radiation has started a movement – The “No Phone Bra Zone”  RF Safe pledges $1 to Breast Cancer Awareness for every RF safe Pink Purse shield designed to block risk of cell phone radiation exposure. It’s unfortunate that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/rf-safe-supports-breast-cancer-awareness-phone-bra-zone-cell-phone-radiation-safety/">RF Safe Supports Breast Cancer Awareness “No Phone Bra Zone” Cell Phone Radiation Safety</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">957</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>List of Lowest Radiation Cell Phones by Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Levels</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/rf-safe-list-lowest-radiation-cell-phones-specific-absorption-rate-sar-levels/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowest Radiation Cell Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>RF Safe suggests consumers start with the lowest radiation cell phones to use with an air-tube headset and Anti-radiation case, pocket, or purse shield for the most prudent avoidance of cell phone radiation. RF SAFE SOLUTION: The SCP (Safe Cell Phone) System FCC Cellular Values: Head SAR &#124; Body SAR &#124; Hotspot  FCC Simultaneous: Head SAR &#124; Body SAR &#124; Hotspot Everyone knows that operating [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/rf-safe-list-lowest-radiation-cell-phones-specific-absorption-rate-sar-levels/">List of Lowest Radiation Cell Phones by Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Levels</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">902</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer Generated RF EXPOSURE Models</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/computer-generated-rf-exposure-models/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2013 07:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF EXPOSURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>These computer generated models shown below illustrate the effects of cell phone radiation. They were independently created by a Canadian university and a South African research company specializing in electromagnetic studies. The Applied Electromagnetics Group in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada has developed computer [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/computer-generated-rf-exposure-models/">Computer Generated RF EXPOSURE Models</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">729</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Modeling Specific Absorption Rate Distribution Of A Smartphone</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/modeling-specific-absorption-rate-distribution-smartphone/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 02:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Modeling The Specific Absorption Rate Distribution Of A Smartphone Source: ANSYS, Inc. SAR Smart Phone Model By ANSYS, Inc. This application models the specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution in a human head, heart, and body exposed to an electromagnetic field emitted from a handheld cellular phone operating in GSM (900 MHz and 1,800 MHz) and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/modeling-specific-absorption-rate-distribution-smartphone/">Modeling Specific Absorption Rate Distribution Of A Smartphone</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">613</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) Ratings</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/iphone-sar-specific-absorption-rate-ratings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 06:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>iPhones   Apple Iphone 3G North America   Frequency Band IC 1g SAR Limit (W/kg) Body Ear GSM 850 1.6 1.030 0.521 GSM 1900 1.6 0.522 1.290 UMTS II 11.66 0.402 1.388 UMTS V 1.6 0.733 0.733 Wi-Fi 1.6 0.088 0.779   Apple Iphone 3G Europe   Frequency Band IC 10g SAR Limit (W/kg) Europe [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/iphone-sar-specific-absorption-rate-ratings/">iPhone SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) Ratings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">973</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALARA Approach to providing protection from cell phone radiation</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/alara-approach-to-providing-protection-from-cell-phone-radiation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 05:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALARA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=91</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ALARA RF Safe Is The Future Of Safe Wireless Communication! In order to minimize the potential risks of biological effects associated with cell phone radiation, exposure limits and guidelines have been established. Even though there are exposure limits and administrative control levels, we strive to keep our radiation exposure well below these levels. The SCP [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/alara-approach-to-providing-protection-from-cell-phone-radiation/">ALARA Approach to providing protection from cell phone radiation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">91</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Need Cell Phone Radiation Protection</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/need-cell-phone-radiation-protection/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 05:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=89</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Cell Phone Radiation Protection Editors Note: Mobile phone radiation and health The concept of measuring safe levels of cell phone radiation exposure using a specific absorption rate (SAR) has been around for many years, but recent developments have test methods in question by the FCC for public safety concerns. The thermal and non-thermal dividing line [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/need-cell-phone-radiation-protection/">Why You Need Cell Phone Radiation Protection</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">89</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FACT: DNA Damage at below safe Cell Phone Radiation Levels</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/fact-dna-damage-safe-cell-phone-radiation-levels/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 04:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies: Cellphone Health Risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dna and the Microwave Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=84</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Readers are probably familiar with the idea of electrophoresis, although they may not know the term. The technique is used for DNA fingerprinting to determine paternity. https://www.rfsafe.com/app/Interactive-Comet-Assay-Slider.html   In television documentaries we often see forensic scientists holding a small X-ray film with lines of bar-codes. These bars are the physical locations of the genetic material [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/fact-dna-damage-safe-cell-phone-radiation-levels/">FACT: DNA Damage at below safe Cell Phone Radiation Levels</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">84</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JrBjQJhHfzk" duration="978">
			<media:player url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JrBjQJhHfzk" />
			<media:title type="html">FACT: DNA Damage at below safe Cell Phone Radiation Levels * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">DNA Damage from Cell Phone Radiation levels of microwave (2.45GHz) radiation, for exposures of only two hours, can increase the frequency of single-strand DNA breaks</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/jrbjqjhhfzk.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cell phone children,Dna and the Microwave Effect,DNA Damage,EMF,EMF Research,FCC,medical studies,rf radiation,Specific Absorption Rate,DNA</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New phone radiation study increased brain tumor risk for children</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/new-phone-radiation-study-increased-brain-tumor-risk-children/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 04:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=74</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A shocking new cell phone radiation study conducted on adolescents and their cell phone usage asks the question, “Are children at increased risk of brain tumors already?” The conclusion of the study is even more shocking than the question because it implicates all children who use cell phones. Almost 3,000 children a year in the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/new-phone-radiation-study-increased-brain-tumor-risk-children/">New phone radiation study increased brain tumor risk for children</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government reassessment of cell phone SAR testing</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/government-reassessment-of-cell-phone-sar-testing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 03:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=67</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Reassessment of cell phone SAR levels testing Scientific research to date has not demonstrated adverse human health effects of exposure to radio-frequency (RF) energy from mobile phone use, but research is ongoing that may increase understanding of any possible effects. In addition, officials from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institutes of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/government-reassessment-of-cell-phone-sar-testing/">Government reassessment of cell phone SAR testing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">67</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murray v. Motorola, Inc Cell Phone Radiation Liability</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/murray-v-motorola-inc-cell-phone-radiation-liability/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 03:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone radiation lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF Radiation Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=65</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Cell Phone Radiation Liability – Cell Phone Cancer Lawsuits UPDATE 11/23/2015: WSJ Reports Murray Cellphone Cancer Case May Cost Wireless Industry Over 1.9 Billion Dollars Federal law does not preempt claims against the cellular phone industry for injuries allegedly caused by the low radio frequency (RF) radiation emitted by cellular phones if those claims are based [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/murray-v-motorola-inc-cell-phone-radiation-liability/">Murray v. Motorola, Inc Cell Phone Radiation Liability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">65</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Cell Phone Radiation Standard and Tort Immunity by Implied Conflict Preemption</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/fcc-cell-phone-radiation-standard-tort-immunity-implied-conflict-preemption/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 03:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dna and the Microwave Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF Radiation Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications Act of 1996]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=62</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FCC Cell Phone Radiation Standard and Tort Immunity by Implied Conflict Preemption I. Introduction [1] Cell phones emit low-level radiation.[1] Constantly.[2] [2] From 1992 to 1998, Dr. Christopher Newman used his cell phone for nearly 350 hours—about ten minutes per day.[3] When he developed a tumor on the side of his head where he used [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/fcc-cell-phone-radiation-standard-tort-immunity-implied-conflict-preemption/">FCC Cell Phone Radiation Standard and Tort Immunity by Implied Conflict Preemption</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reported Health Effects From Non-Ionizing RF Radiation</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/reported-health-effects-non-ionizing-rf-radiation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 02:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF Radiation Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=56</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Reported Biological Effects From Non-Ionizing Radio-frequency RF Radiation Low Level RF Radiation Health Concern The following studies indicate biological effects at cell phone rf radiation exposure levels which are far below what can be explained by “thermal effects”, and well within the range people are commonly exposed to every day on their cell phones. NOTE: [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/reported-health-effects-non-ionizing-rf-radiation/">Reported Health Effects From Non-Ionizing RF Radiation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell Phones May Damage Nerves In The Scalp</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/cell-phones-may-damage-nerves-scalp/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2000 06:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Brain Barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF Radiation Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=2155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Cell Phones May Damage Nerves In The Scalp Reuters Journalist: Amy Norton August 15, 2000 As cellular phones become ubiquitous, their status as a possible health threat–either as a distraction to drivers or a potential cause of brain tumors–is gaining more attention. Now, investigators say there is evidence that cell phones may damage nerves in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/cell-phones-may-damage-nerves-scalp/">Cell Phones May Damage Nerves In The Scalp</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2155</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell Phone Standards &#8216;Fail To Reflect Risk&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/cell-phone-standards-fail-reflect-risk/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2000 05:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=2021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Cell Phone Standards ‘Fail To Reflect Risk’ The Courier-Mail Journalist: Sean Parnell June 21, 2000   The Australian Senate has been told that mobile telephone standards in the country do not adequately reflect health risks.   On 20 June 2000, principal scientific officer at Sydney’s St Vincent’s Hospital, Peter French, called for tougher restrictions on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/cell-phone-standards-fail-reflect-risk/">Cell Phone Standards &#8216;Fail To Reflect Risk&#8217;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2021</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC: Cell Phone Safety Tests Need Standards</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/fcc-cell-phone-safety-tests-need-standards/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 1999 01:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FCC: Cell Phone Tests Need Standards Dallas Morning News October 23, 1999 U.S. regulators warned a technical panel Friday to promptly develop tests for determining safe levels of wireless phone emissions or face standards imposed by the Federal Communications Commission. Manufacturers such as Motorola Inc. and Nokia Oyj use different methods for testing microwave radiation [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/fcc-cell-phone-safety-tests-need-standards/">FCC: Cell Phone Safety Tests Need Standards</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">387</post-id>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
