<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>EMF | * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rfsafe.com/tag/emf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/tag/emf/</link>
	<description>Information On Smartphone Radiation Levels And Cell Phone Radiation Mitigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74557350</site>	<item>
		<title>The Collateral Damage of Corporate Science: How EMF Dangers Got Buried</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/the-collateral-damage-of-corporate-science-how-emf-dangers-got-buried/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioelectromagnetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defunding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disinformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Robert O Becker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Henry Lai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electromagnetic Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Toxicology Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-thermal Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Seafarer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wargame Memo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rfsafe.com/?p=143794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When the Funding Dries Up A Multi-Decade Cover-up In a 1977 60 Minutes segment on “Project Seafarer,” Dr. Robert O. Becker—author of The Body Electric and a pioneering researcher of bioelectromagnetics—outlined a chilling dynamic in government-funded science: when research starts revealing uncomfortable truths, the money disappears. “I believe it’s five specific projects in which positive results [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/the-collateral-damage-of-corporate-science-how-emf-dangers-got-buried/">The Collateral Damage of Corporate Science: How EMF Dangers Got Buried</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">143794</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/InJEDq3RzIc" duration="31">
			<media:player url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/InJEDq3RzIc" />
			<media:title type="html">The Collateral Damage of Corporate Science: How EMF Dangers Got Buried * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">When the Funding Dries Up A Multi-Decade Cover-up In a 1977 60 Minutes segment on “Project Seafarer,” Dr. Robert O. Becker—author of The Body Electric and a pioneering researcher of bioelectromagnetics—outlined a chilling dynamic in government-funded science: when research starts revealing uncomfort</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/injedq3rzic.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>Bioelectromagnetics,Cancer Risk,Defunding,Disinformation,Dr Robert O Becker,Dr. Henry Lai,Electromagnetic Pollution,EMF,EMF Hazards,Environmental Protection Agency,FCC,Government Funding,Jerry Phillips,National Toxicology Program,Non-thermal Effects,NTP,Project Seafarer,Scientific Research,Wargame Memo</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump’s Executive Order Finally Mentions Wireless Radiation: What It Means for Childhood Chronic Disease Research</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/trumps-executive-order-finally-mentions-wireless-radiation-what-it-means-for-childhood-chronic-disease-research/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 17:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biological Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childhood Chronic Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chronic Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electromagnetic radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Crises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigative Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Make America Healthy Again Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Toxicology Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-thermal Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTP Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFK Jr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rfsafe.com/?p=143281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A New Federal Focus on Chronic Disease On February 13, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order establishing the Make America Healthy Again Commission, chaired by Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This Commission aims to combat the growing crisis of chronic disease in the United States, particularly among children. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/trumps-executive-order-finally-mentions-wireless-radiation-what-it-means-for-childhood-chronic-disease-research/">Trump’s Executive Order Finally Mentions Wireless Radiation: What It Means for Childhood Chronic Disease Research</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">143281</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unmasking the Grand Wireless Conspiracy</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/unmasking-the-grand-wireless-conspiracy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 05:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1996]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chronic Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFK Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RICO Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 704]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiritual Beliefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rfsafe.com/?p=143143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How 1996 Changed America’s Health Forever—and Why #TrumpRepeal704 Might Save Us “There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, and nothing hidden that will not be made known.”— Luke 8:17 In 1996, the United States Congress, with broad bipartisan support, passed the Telecommunications Act—heralded as a leap toward a modern, interconnected America. Yet buried [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/unmasking-the-grand-wireless-conspiracy/">Unmasking the Grand Wireless Conspiracy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">143143</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z7tHONlWpBo" duration="63">
			<media:player url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z7tHONlWpBo" />
			<media:title type="html">Unmasking the Grand Wireless Conspiracy * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">How 1996 Changed America’s Health Forever—and Why #TrumpRepeal704 Might Save Us “There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, and nothing hidden that will not be made known.”— Luke 8:17 In 1996, the United States Congress, with broad bipartisan support, passed the Telecommunications Act—he</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/z7thonlwpbo-1.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>1996,Children&#039;s Health,Chronic Diseases,Conspiracy,Constitutional Rights,Donald Trump,EMF,FCC,Public Health,RFK Jr,RICO Act,Scientific Integrity,Section 704,Spiritual Beliefs,Telecommunications Act</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity and Oxidative Stress: Immune Response and Oxidative Stress</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/electromagnetic-hypersensitivity-and-oxidative-stress-immune-response-and-oxidative-stress/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 03:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antioxidant Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classroom Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entropic Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Frequency EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitigating Entropic Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxidative Stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reactive Oxygen Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rfsafe.com/?p=130541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>07/29 – Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS): An Urgent Humanitarian Crisis 08/01 – Mitigating Entropic Waste (WiFi/Tablet Radiation) in Classrooms: A Guide for Educators and Administrators 08/01 – Entropic Waste This framework suggests that EHS might be linked to oxidative stress and inflammation in the body, offering a possible pathway for developing treatments to alleviate symptoms. The article titled “Hypersensitivity to man-made electromagnetic [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/electromagnetic-hypersensitivity-and-oxidative-stress-immune-response-and-oxidative-stress/">Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity and Oxidative Stress: Immune Response and Oxidative Stress</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">130541</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overpowered: Hazards of Cell Phone EMF Exposure and Reducing Health Risk from Cell Phone Radiation</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/overpowered-hazards-cell-phone-emf-exposure-reducing-health-risk-cell-phone-radiation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=2031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>According to RF Safe, cell phone radiation health hazards are well documented in a new book by Martin Blank, PhD titled, “Overpowered: What Science Tells Us About the Dangers of Cell Phones and Other Wifi-age Devices.” RF Safe suggests enhancing measures of the precautionary approach by utilizing cell phone radiation safety accessories often overlooked by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/overpowered-hazards-cell-phone-emf-exposure-reducing-health-risk-cell-phone-radiation/">Overpowered: Hazards of Cell Phone EMF Exposure and Reducing Health Risk from Cell Phone Radiation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2031</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALARA Approach to providing protection from cell phone radiation</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/alara-approach-to-providing-protection-from-cell-phone-radiation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 05:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALARA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=91</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ALARA RF Safe Is The Future Of Safe Wireless Communication! In order to minimize the potential risks of biological effects associated with cell phone radiation, exposure limits and guidelines have been established. Even though there are exposure limits and administrative control levels, we strive to keep our radiation exposure well below these levels. The SCP [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/alara-approach-to-providing-protection-from-cell-phone-radiation/">ALARA Approach to providing protection from cell phone radiation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">91</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faraday cage effect and cell phones when driving</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/faraday-cage-effect-and-cell-phones-when-driving/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 04:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faraday cage effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation shielding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=87</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>[pullquote]Windshield Mount Cell Phone Holders can play a role in reducing invisible RF hazards and getting the best possible phone reception.[/pullquote] The Faraday Cage (named after its discoverer) means that the electric charge on a conductor sits on the outer surface of it. Therefore, no electrostatic field is present within the conductor  FARADAY CAGE – [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/faraday-cage-effect-and-cell-phones-when-driving/">Faraday cage effect and cell phones when driving</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">87</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FACT: DNA Damage at below safe Cell Phone Radiation Levels</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/fact-dna-damage-safe-cell-phone-radiation-levels/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 04:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies: Cellphone Health Risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dna and the Microwave Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=84</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Readers are probably familiar with the idea of electrophoresis, although they may not know the term. The technique is used for DNA fingerprinting to determine paternity. https://www.rfsafe.com/app/Interactive-Comet-Assay-Slider.html   In television documentaries we often see forensic scientists holding a small X-ray film with lines of bar-codes. These bars are the physical locations of the genetic material [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/fact-dna-damage-safe-cell-phone-radiation-levels/">FACT: DNA Damage at below safe Cell Phone Radiation Levels</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">84</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JrBjQJhHfzk" duration="978">
			<media:player url="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JrBjQJhHfzk" />
			<media:title type="html">FACT: DNA Damage at below safe Cell Phone Radiation Levels * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">DNA Damage from Cell Phone Radiation levels of microwave (2.45GHz) radiation, for exposures of only two hours, can increase the frequency of single-strand DNA breaks</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/jrbjqjhhfzk.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cell phone children,Dna and the Microwave Effect,DNA Damage,EMF,EMF Research,FCC,medical studies,rf radiation,Specific Absorption Rate,DNA</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell Phone Cancer Link: Two Studies Provide New Evidence</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/cell-phone-cancer-link-two-studies-provide-new-evidence/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 04:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=76</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Cell Phone Cancer Link Cell phones didn’t really begin to happen until 1973. According to Wikipedia, during that year, a Motorola executive made an experimental phone call to Bell Labs — named after the inventor of the telephone, Alexander Graham Bell (this is a shoutout, ya’ll) — using a handheld device. Although some may argue [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/cell-phone-cancer-link-two-studies-provide-new-evidence/">Cell Phone Cancer Link: Two Studies Provide New Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">76</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New phone radiation study increased brain tumor risk for children</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/new-phone-radiation-study-increased-brain-tumor-risk-children/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 04:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=74</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A shocking new cell phone radiation study conducted on adolescents and their cell phone usage asks the question, “Are children at increased risk of brain tumors already?” The conclusion of the study is even more shocking than the question because it implicates all children who use cell phones. Almost 3,000 children a year in the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/new-phone-radiation-study-increased-brain-tumor-risk-children/">New phone radiation study increased brain tumor risk for children</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Cell Phone Radiation Standard and Tort Immunity by Implied Conflict Preemption</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/fcc-cell-phone-radiation-standard-tort-immunity-implied-conflict-preemption/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 03:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dna and the Microwave Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Ionizing Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF Radiation Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications Act of 1996]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=62</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FCC Cell Phone Radiation Standard and Tort Immunity by Implied Conflict Preemption I. Introduction [1] Cell phones emit low-level radiation.[1] Constantly.[2] [2] From 1992 to 1998, Dr. Christopher Newman used his cell phone for nearly 350 hours—about ten minutes per day.[3] When he developed a tumor on the side of his head where he used [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/fcc-cell-phone-radiation-standard-tort-immunity-implied-conflict-preemption/">FCC Cell Phone Radiation Standard and Tort Immunity by Implied Conflict Preemption</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CURRENT SCIENCE ON RADIATION FROM CELL PHONES</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/current-science-radiation-from-cell-phones/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 03:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=60</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CURRENT SCIENCE ON RADIATION FROM CELL PHONES – Radiation is the transport of energy in an electromagnetic wave. These waves are used by cell phones to communicate. But not only the cell phones emit also devices like the TV, microwaves, hair dryers, stove, computer screen, radio antennas, electric light, etc.. Even in nature. The sun [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/current-science-radiation-from-cell-phones/">CURRENT SCIENCE ON RADIATION FROM CELL PHONES</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">60</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will RF Radiation From Your Cell Phone Kill You?</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/will-rf-radiation-cell-phone-kill/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 00:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=25</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the NCI study is wrong. Maybe the animal studies are wrong. Maybe physics is wrong, and there is some as yet undiscovered mechanism by which these low-energy rf radiation fields do damage to DNA. How big a cancer problem would exposure to radiation from power lines be? It is a tragedy, obviously, for a child [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/will-rf-radiation-cell-phone-kill/">Will RF Radiation From Your Cell Phone Kill You?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just How Safe Is Your Cell Phone To Use?</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/just-safe-cell-phone-use/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 05:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headset Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF Radiation Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=2145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Just How Safe Is Your Phone To Use? Belfast Telegraph August 11, 2000 Health fears over hands-6.00 mobile phones are expected to be played down by a Government report to be published today. -A 41-year-old neurologist in the States filed a GBP50 million lawsuit against Motorola last week for damages following the discovery of a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/just-safe-cell-phone-use/">Just How Safe Is Your Cell Phone To Use?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2145</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Phone Safety Leaves Experts Divided</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/mobile-phone-safety-leaves-experts-divided/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2000 05:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell phone breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=2143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mobile Phone Safety Leaves Experts Divided The Guardian Journalist: James Meek August 09, 2000 The Consumers’ Association yesterday accused the government of having used the wrong tests to assess the safety of hands-6.00 kits for mobile phones, saying the association stood by its claim that the devices failed to protect users against radiation. A government [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/mobile-phone-safety-leaves-experts-divided/">Mobile Phone Safety Leaves Experts Divided</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2143</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DTI and Which? At Odds Over Phone Safety</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/dti-odds-phone-safety/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 05:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headset Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peel n Shield™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pocket shield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=2138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>DTI and Which? At Odds Over Cell Phone Safety The Register Journalist: Lucy Sheriff August 08, 2000 Consumers have been left without a clue – should they go hands-6.00 or clamp their  cell phone to their ear? Research published by the government today indicates that hands-6.00 mobile phone kits are safe to use. These new [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/dti-odds-phone-safety/">DTI and Which? At Odds Over Phone Safety</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2138</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cellphone Risk: Could Cancer Lawsuits Come To Europe</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/cellphone-risk-cancer-lawsuits-come-europe/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2000 04:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airtube headset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dna and the Microwave Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF Radiation Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=2131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Cellphone Risk: Could Cancer Lawsuits Come To Europe ZD Net UK Journalist: Graeme Wearden August 04, 2000 The whole world is watching the outcome of a neurologist’s claim against  cellphone manufacturers If the impending lawsuit against Motorola is successful in the US, it could force mobile phone manufacturers here to settle out of court in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/cellphone-risk-cancer-lawsuits-come-europe/">Cellphone Risk: Could Cancer Lawsuits Come To Europe</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2131</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell Phone Standards &#8216;Fail To Reflect Risk&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://www.rfsafe.com/cell-phone-standards-fail-reflect-risk/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RF Safe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2000 05:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific Absorption Rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfsafe.com/?p=2021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Cell Phone Standards ‘Fail To Reflect Risk’ The Courier-Mail Journalist: Sean Parnell June 21, 2000   The Australian Senate has been told that mobile telephone standards in the country do not adequately reflect health risks.   On 20 June 2000, principal scientific officer at Sydney’s St Vincent’s Hospital, Peter French, called for tougher restrictions on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com/cell-phone-standards-fail-reflect-risk/">Cell Phone Standards &#8216;Fail To Reflect Risk&#8217;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.rfsafe.com">RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2021</post-id>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
