PLEASE VISIT OUR NEW SITE - HERE

Post comments on anything

What is RF ? - Antenna Fields

[EMF Spectrum] [Ionizing] [Non-ionizing
[Near Field & Far Field] [ELF/EMF
[Schumann Resonance] [Faraday Effect]
 [Reflection] [Interference]
[RF Hazards] [RF Protection] [The SCP System]
[About SAR] [Exposure Models] [Glossary

Antenna Radiation Fields
There are  two traditional radiation fields with transitional phases in-between occupying 6.00 space as a result of an antenna radiating power.

  1. Near-field, (seen in bright red above) also called the reactive near-field region, is the region that is closest to the transmitting antenna and for which the reactive field dominates over the radiative fields


    Fresnel zone, also called the radiating near-field, is that region between the reactive near-field and the far-field regions and is the region in which the radiation fields dominate and where the angular field distribution depends on distance from the transmitting antenna.


  2. Far-field, (seen in purple red above) or Rayleigh distance, is the region where the radiation pattern is independent of distance from the transmitting antenna.

When evaluating exposure to an RF source, it is important not to forget the Transmitter is the source of  RF Radiation.  Because a "Handset" or cell phone itself houses a high power microwave transmitter, and normally held very close to a users body!  It is especially important for cell phone users to address the SCP System in its entirety for taking maximum RF Safety precautions. 

Editors Note. 
Contrary to popular belief, using a cell phone headset can put a cell phone user in more danger . 

Media is completely responsible for a common misconception regarding cell phone safety, "that by moving the cell phone away from the brain, users eliminate harmful exposure to EMF and any resulting health risk". 

FACTS ARE: A cell phone user wearing a cell phone on their belt or in a pocket to reduce exposure to the brain is only increasing exposure to the torso and reproductive organs when not using a properly rf shielded cell phone handset

Not to mention plugging an unshielded wire into a radiating element (such as a cell phone) exhibits the same properties as if you put tin foil on a old TV with rabbit ear antennas, The point being using an unshielded hands 6.00 headset is no different than sticking the antenna in your ear!

 

 

 

 

Antenna Near Field.  The maximum power density in front of an antenna (e.g., at the antenna surface) can be approximately by the following equation:

equat1.gif (1165 bytes)

where:   Ssurface = maximum power density at the antenna surface
P = power fed to the antenna
A = physical area of the aperture antenna

 

Top

 

 

Extent of Near-Field Region.   In the near-field, or Fresnel region, of the main beam, the power density can reach a maximum before it begins to decrease with distance.  The extent of the near-field can be described by the following equation (D and in same lambda.gif (60 bytes) units):

equat2.gif (1135 bytes)

where:   Rnf = extent of near-field
D = maximum dimension of antenna (diameter if circular)
lambda.gif (60 bytes) = wavelength

The magnitude of the on-axis (main beam) power density varies  according to location in the near-field.  However, the maximum value of the near-field, on-axis, power density can be expressed by the following equation:

equat3.gif (1187 bytes)

where:   Snf = maximum near-field power density
= aperture efficiency, typically 0.5-0.75
P = power fed to the antenna
D = antenna diameter

Aperture efficiency can be estimated, or a reasonable approximation for circular apertures can be obtained from the ratio of the effective aperture area to the physical area as follows:

equat4.gif (1491 bytes)

where:   = aperture efficiency for circular apertures
G = power gain in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator
lambda.gif (60 bytes) = wavelength
D = antenna diameter

If the antenna gain is not known, it can be calculated from the following equation using the actual or estimated value for aperture efficiency:

equat5.gif (1144 bytes)

where:   = aperture efficiency
G = power gain in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator
lambda.gif (60 bytes) = wavelength
A = physical area of the antenna

Transition Region.  Power density in the transition region decreases inversely with distance from the antenna, while power density in the far-field (Fraunhofer region) of the antenna decreases inversely with the square of the distance.  For purposes of evaluating RF exposure, the distance to the beginning of the far-field region (farthest extent of the transition region) can be approximated by the following equation:

equat6.gif (1181 bytes)

where:   Rff = distance to beginning of far-field
D = antenna diameter
lambda.gif (60 bytes) = wavelength

The transition region will then be the region extending from Rnf, calculated from Equation (12), to Rff.   If the location of interest falls within this transition region, the on-axis power density can be determined from the following equation:

equat7.gif (1174 bytes)

where:   St = power density in the transition region
Snf = maximum power density for near-field calculated above
Rnf = extent of near-field calculated above
R = distance to point of interest

Top

 

Far-Field Region:  The power density in the far-field or Fraunhofer region of the antenna pattern decreases inversely as the square of the distance.  The power density in the far-field region of the radiation pattern can be estimated by the general equation discussed earlier:

equat8.gif (1187 bytes)

where:   Sff = power density (on axis)
P = power fed to the antenna
G = power gain of the antenna in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator
R = distance to point of interest

In the far-field region, power is distributed in a series of maxima and minima as a function of the off-axis angle (defined by the antenna axis, the center of the antenna and the specific point of interest.)  For constant phase, or uniform illumination over the aperture, the main beam will be the location of the greatest of these maxima.  The on-axis power densities calculated from the above formulas represent the maximum exposure levels that the system can produce.  Off-axis power densities will be considerably less.

For off-axis calculations in the near-field and in the transition region it can be assumed that, if the point of interest is at least one antenna diameter removed from the center of the main beam, the power density at the point would be at least a factor of 100 (20 dB) less than the value calculated for the equivalent distance in the main beam.

For practical estimation of RF fields in the off-axis vicinity of aperture, use of the antenna radiation pattern envelope can be useful.  For example, for the case of an earth station in the fixed-satellite service, the Commission's Rules specify maximum allowable gain for antenna sidelobes not within the plane of the geostationary satellite orbit, such as at ground level*.  In such cases, the rules require that the gain of the antenna shall lie below the envelope defined by:

32 - {25log10()} dBi   for theta.gif (60 bytes) 48º
and:  
- 10 dBi for 48º< theta.gif (60 bytes) 180º

where:   theta.gif (60 bytes) = the angle in degrees from the axis of the main lobe
dBi = dB relative to an isotropic radiator

Use of the gain obtained from these relationships in simple far-field calculations, such as Equation 18, will generally be sufficient for estimating RF field levels in the surrounding environment, since the apparent aperture of the antenna is typically very small compared to its frontal area.

Top

 

"In God We Trust"  Site Prayer "

>> Safe Cell Phone Usage

Cell phone safety accessories alone can not protect you. Learn how to use your cell phone safely in 3 simple steps! Be RF Safe!
          
Learn more >>

For cell phones not using RF Safe Approved antennas its highly recommended that you use an RF3 Air-tube Headset with a Wireguard and Pocket or Belt Clip Shield!

>> State Cell Phone Laws

 

Legislation for laws requiring hands free cell phone usage are going in effect all over the USA! Check your state

          
Learn more >>
>> Cell Phone Radiation Levels
The concept of specific absorption rate (SAR) has been around for many years, but recent developments have test methods in question for public safety concerns.
         
Learn more >>
>> Cell Phone Radiation Hazards
Click Her To See DNA Damage From Cell Phone Radiation There are 50,000 trillion
cells in the body, and even in older people the body is still actively creating another billion new cells every hour, so the incorruptibility of DNA is all- important in our health and survival  Learn more >>

Please don't let your KIDS use cell phones except in emergencies! Children have much thinner skulls. CLICK TO VIEW IMAGES
Kids are at more risk from cell phone radiation
   5 yr        10 yr     Adult

llphone radiation  http://rfsafe.com/index.php

Pocket Shields ] BeltClip Shields ] Headset Shields ] RF3  Headsets ] Deflect Phone Radiation ]

 

Cell Phone Radiation NEWS 03-93
 

Local News & Phone Laws

   

Your cell phones SAR Level

Find RF Safe Distributors

Copyright 2003 rfsafe.com  Our technical/sales departments are available Mon-Fri
 Toll Free 1-800-649-SAFE (7233) Or e-mail us at webmaster@rfsafe.com

 

 

"In God We Trust"  Site Prayer "

>> Safe Cell Phone Usage

Cell phone safety accessories alone can not protect you. Learn how to use your cell phone safely in 3 simple steps! Be RF Safe!
          
Learn more >>

For cell phones not using RF Safe Approved antennas its highly recommended that you use an RF3 Air-tube Headset with a Wireguard and Pocket or Belt Clip Shield!

>> State Cell Phone Laws

 

Legislation for laws requiring hands free cell phone usage are going in effect all over the USA! Check your state

          
Learn more >>
>> Cell Phone Radiation Levels
The concept of specific absorption rate (SAR) has been around for many years, but recent developments have test methods in question for public safety concerns.
         
Learn more >>
>> Cell Phone Radiation Hazards
Click Her To See DNA Damage From Cell Phone Radiation There are 50,000 trillion
cells in the body, and even in older people the body is still actively creating another billion new cells every hour, so the incorruptibility of DNA is all- important in our health and survival  Learn more >>

Please don't let your KIDS use cell phones except in emergencies! Children have much thinner skulls. CLICK TO VIEW IMAGES
Kids are at more risk from cell phone radiation
   5 yr        10 yr     Adult

llphone radiation  http://rfsafe.com/index.php

Pocket Shields ] BeltClip Shields ] Headset Shields ] RF3  Headsets ] Deflect Phone Radiation ]

 

Cell Phone Radiation NEWS 03-93
 

Local News & Phone Laws

   

Your cell phones SAR Level

Find RF Safe Distributors

Copyright 2003 rfsafe.com  Our technical/sales departments are available Mon-Fri
 Toll Free 1-800-649-SAFE (7233) Or e-mail us at webmaster@rfsafe.com