PLEASE VISIT OUR NEW SITE - HERE

Post comments on anything

Mobile Phones Are Akin To Cyanide, Says Academic
Register
Journalist: Sean Fleming
February 6, 2000

Giving a child a mobile phone is no different from handing out cyanide pills, according to a leading UK academic.

This was one of the bizarre claims made in an article on whether or not schoolchildren should be given lessons on mobile phone safety, featured in the Kingston Borough Guardian.

The remark was made by Prof Gerald Hyland, of the University of Warwick, who hit the headlines last June when he raised concerns about phone transmission masts being sited near schools. While no one would doubt the good Prof's pedigree, his recent outburst is certainly open to debate.

"It is totally irresponsible for parents to let their children have mobiles. It is the equivalent of giving the child a cyanide pill," he said.

While many people have expressed fears over the links between the use of mobile phones and a variety of ailments, no one has proved beyond doubt that mobile phones are harmful, never mind potentially deadly.

The same cannot be said about cyanide.

Prof Hyland's remark is made all the more interesting when we look back at his ban phone masts from schools call last June. Back then, The Register reported Prof Hyland admitting there was no evidence to back up his claims, yet he was still calling for an outright ban on siting phone masts near schools.

Rather an extreme stance for a man of science (he's a physicist) who you'd expect to find sticking faithfully to facts and evidence. Prof Hyland talks about parents being irresponsible, yet he seems to have abdicated himself from all responsibility when speaking out as a leading academic in this field.

Only an idiot -- or maybe the chief exec of a mobile phone company -- would not want to see more research carried out into the possibility that prolonged use of mobiles can provoke the onset of cancer - which has been one of the most common concerns. But to liken a phone to a cyanide pill reduces the argument to the trite and trivial.

Luddites and techno-phobes everywhere are more than happy to sound off on the subject of giving mobile phones to children. But far from just being a fashion accessory -- although that does come into it -- many parents give their kids a phone in the hope it will actually keep them safe.

Some 300,000 mobile phones were bought for use by children in the UK in the run-up to Christmas '99. Parents hope a child with a phone will be less likely to be abducted on the way home from school, or visiting their friends, or wherever. Now, while the statistical likelihood of your child being abducted is probably no greater today than it was 20 years ago, this is a topic which has a grip on the parental psyche, due in part to the lurid detail with which tales of abducted children are covered by some newspapers.

So, what do concerned parents do -- they get mobiles for their kids. Will this really keep them any safer than their phoneless peers? Who can say. If it means your teenage daughter can ring you at 11pm to ask you to collect her rather than her having to walk home alone, then maybe.

But what about the possible health risks? Parents will continue to fret over the welfare of their children, just as they always have. We can assume that most people will have had some contact with mobiles give you cancer stories, and the fact that more than a quarter of a million UK youngsters got a mobile last Christmas gives some indication of where parents' priorities lie. Not that they don't care about the little darlings' health, they're just more bothered about other stuff.

Of course, they could be wrong -- 'pay as you talk' could become 'fry as you walk'. So in the meantime those lessons on safe use of mobiles could be a wise move.

What's needed is a properly funded and coordinated research programme that will examine the possible links between phone usage and ill-health. For this to happen the network operators and the handset manufacturers will have to take the lead. But it will also need the wider support of government bodies and academics like Prof Hyland. Which means taking the emphasis off talk of the Boogie Man and sticking to some cold hard facts

 

 

"In God We Trust"  Site Prayer "

>> Safe Cell Phone Usage

Cell phone safety accessories alone can not protect you. Learn how to use your cell phone safely in 3 simple steps! Be RF Safe!
          
Learn more >>

For cell phones not using RF Safe Approved antennas its highly recommended that you use an RF3 Air-tube Headset with a Wireguard and Pocket or Belt Clip Shield!

>> State Cell Phone Laws

 

Legislation for laws requiring hands free cell phone usage are going in effect all over the USA! Check your state

          
Learn more >>
>> Cell Phone Radiation Levels
The concept of specific absorption rate (SAR) has been around for many years, but recent developments have test methods in question for public safety concerns.
         
Learn more >>
>> Cell Phone Radiation Hazards
Click Her To See DNA Damage From Cell Phone Radiation There are 50,000 trillion
cells in the body, and even in older people the body is still actively creating another billion new cells every hour, so the incorruptibility of DNA is all- important in our health and survival  Learn more >>

Please don't let your KIDS use cell phones except in emergencies! Children have much thinner skulls. CLICK TO VIEW IMAGES
Kids are at more risk from cell phone radiation
   5 yr        10 yr     Adult

llphone radiation  http://rfsafe.com/index.php

Pocket Shields ] BeltClip Shields ] Headset Shields ] RF3  Headsets ] Deflect Phone Radiation ]

 

Cell Phone Radiation NEWS 03-93
 

Local News & Phone Laws

   

Your cell phones SAR Level

Find RF Safe Distributors

Copyright 2003 rfsafe.com  Our technical/sales departments are available Mon-Fri
 Toll Free 1-800-649-SAFE (7233) Or e-mail us at webmaster@rfsafe.com