DNA Damage
SAR No Good!
What\'s Suggested
Product Comparison
Safe Phones
RF Safe Headsets
Belt Shields
Pocket Shields
Shopping Cart
Your cart is empty.

[ Browse ]
Product Categories
· Air Tube Headsets/Standard Headsets
· Ferrite Bead/ Wire Guard
· Headset Adapters
· Personal Shielding Protection
· Public Exposure Videos
· RF Safe Packages
· RFS Clothing
· RFS External Antennas
· RFS Meters
· STORE RETURN POLICY
Old Articles
BLoG Archives

Monday, June 23
·
Wednesday, June 18
· Possible health hazards from mobile phone radiation
Wednesday, June 11
· Teen insomnia linked to cellphone use
Monday, June 09
· Cell towers a health risk at Lodi schools?
Thursday, June 05
· Mobile Phones: Are They More Dangerous Than Smoking?
· Is Ted Kennedy’s Cancer Linked to Cell Phone Use?
Wednesday, June 04
· Are wireless phones dangerous?
Saturday, May 24
· Listen! Cell Phones May Cause Brain Cancer
· Are mobile towers safe?
· Mobile Phone Use While Pregnant May Seriously Damage Unborn
Sunday, May 04
· Beware of Technology During Allergy Season
· Cell phone tower proposal moved, neighbors resist
Friday, April 25
· Scientists Agree That EMFs Pose a Threat to Your Health
· Cell phone tower plan dropped
· Cell Phone Tower Going Up On Man's Roof
Thursday, April 10
· Will Your Cell Phone Kill You?
Saturday, April 05
· Cellphones more harmful than smoking
Friday, April 04
· Reducing Electromagnetic Frequency Exposure May Improve Your Health
Saturday, March 29
· Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age
Thursday, March 27
· Static over cell phone tower
Thursday, March 13
· The truth about using hands-free devices behind the wheel
Wednesday, January 16
· Where cancer-causing agents lurk
· Cell Phones Dangerous for Children
Thursday, January 10
· Cancer and mobile phones: the warnings are getting stronger
· Trumbull council OKs cell antenna
Sunday, January 06
· HEALTH: FRENCH MINISTRY SAYS NOT TO CELL PHONES FOR KIDS
Thursday, January 03
· Trumbull considers cell tower deal
Sunday, December 30
· Telcos get mixed signals about better reception
Wednesday, December 12
· Mobile phones increase the risk of tumours
Monday, December 10
· Bloomfield debates cell tower safety
Saturday, December 08
· New cell tower approved despite health concerns
Monday, December 03
· This stupid gadget doesn’t work and you shouldn’t buy it and it sucks
· Balloon test tabled
Saturday, December 01
· Cell Phones and Kids: Not a Safe Combination
Friday, November 30
· Cell tower still could happen
Wednesday, November 28
· Berkeley council takes no vote on cell-phone towers
· Group calls for limitations on cellular antennas
· Israeli Druse riot over installation of cell phone tower
· Beware cell phone users
Thursday, November 22
· Vaughan councillors call for cell tower plan
· Effects of Electropollution On Hormones and Breast Cancer
Saturday, September 22
· Mobile phone mast: Possible cause of cancer, fatigue
Thursday, September 20
· Lincolnshire head opposes phone mast
Wednesday, September 12
· Mobile industry holds its breath
· Irritable and sleepy? Blame your cellphone for it
Monday, September 10
· Mobile phone use and cancer linked
· Radiation clue to brain-cell damage by mobiles
· HEALTH RISK OF VILLAGE PHONE MAST SCHEME
Saturday, September 08
· Hold the Line: The Debate Over the Health Effects of Wireless
Friday, September 07
· Mobile Phone Radiation

Older Articles

www.bestdealon.com

BDO BLoG Archives

Keywords

Story Title Anger voiced at Stanground phone mast plans
Keyword: danger of cellphone mast


Keywords powered by
BestDealOn.com
Previous Article Cell tower plan headed for court  ---  Next Article Mobile Phone Radiation Standard Expected This Year
Anger voiced at Stanground phone mast plans
PHP-Nuke

PLANS to put up a mobile phone mast just metres away from homes have been met with fierce opposition.

Service provider 02 wants to locate a 12.5-metre column with antennae, near Havelock Farm in Whittlesey Road, Stanground, Peterborough.
But people living in nearby Park Farm say they fear the mast could be a health hazard and will look ugly, and are angry about a lack of consultation on the matter.

Phil Gaunt (39), who lives in Houghton Avenue, has written to Peterborough City Council to complain about the proposed development.

He said: "The mast would be less than 50 yards from my back garden and I believe it would be an eyesore and a danger to the residents of Park Farm.

 

"Concerns have been raised about the long-term effects of constant bombardment by microwave radiation and the technology has not been proved to be safe."

Mr Gaunt claimed many people were unaware of the planned installation of a mobile phone mast and said the applicant should have made more of an effort to canvass local opinion.

Residents have contacted their local councillor Janet Wilkinson to voice their concerns and have written to the city council.

In July this year Mr Gaunt was threatened with court action for displaying a banner advertising a community website on the side of his home without planning permission. He is still trying to resolve that issue with planning officials.

"How can it be fine to erect a huge phone mast without permission, but not a small banner for a non-profit making community website?" he asked.

Government policy states that mobile phone masts under 15m do not require planning permission and local authorities are unable to object to them on health grounds.

Peterborough City Council is however seeking views on the plan and will pass on comments to the applicant.

Spokesman Mike Lennox said: "The O2 application was received on September 15 and initial letters to residents in nearby properties in Barham Close, Peckover Close and Havelock Drive were mailed on September 25 and a site notice was put up.

"Following a request from Councillor Janet Wilkinson, further letters were distributed to residents of properties up to 250 metres from the site and additional site notices were put up at the entrance to Framlingham Road and near the school.

"Normally, there is a 21-day opportunity for people to express comments but the decision in this case is not scheduled to be made until November 9."

Mr Lennox added: "Since this proposed mast is only 12.5 metres tall, it will have no more impact on the landscape than other "street furniture" such as lamp-posts and telephone posts."

Article by: Jonathan Sandall


Posted on Friday, October 20 @ 09:10:30 UTC by admin
What do you think about this site?

Ummmm, not bad
Cool
Terrific
The best one!
I'm glad someone made it!



Results
Polls

Votes: 8708
Comments: 5
"Anger voiced at Stanground phone mast plans" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register
AD
 
Options
Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

 Printer Friendly  Print as Text
 Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend


RELATED SEARCHES

Related News (Keyword Search)

  • Vaughan councillors call for cell tower plan
  • Cell-phone firms to be asked to shift towers
  • Hollow victory for phone mast campaigners
  • Phone radiation could be bad for sperm
  • Victory for people power
  • A mast too far for planners
  • Council gets £400,000 from flats masts
  • People power topples plans for mobile mast
  • Bright ideas in bulbs
  • Cell phone use linked to brain tumors?
  • Cellphone poses lightning risk
  • Important Study Facts Often Missing In Media Reports About Medical Research
  • Cell Phones Rising
  • Request for Prayer
  • Philips cell phone SAR Levels
  • Please pray
  • Kids and Cell Phones a bad connection
  • Flash Space Shuttle Columbia Tribute
  • 500 Stories Posted For RFS Members In 30 Days

    Related News (Title Search)
  • COLUMN: The antennas are coming
  • Handsfree cellphone law in effect
  • Speak up to stop the cell tower
  • Parent asks church to reconsider cell tower proposal
  • Mobile phones and kids: helpful or harmful?

  • Possible health hazards from mobile phone radiation
  • Teen insomnia linked to cellphone use
  • Cell towers a health risk at Lodi schools?
  • Mobile Phones: Are They More Dangerous Than Smoking?
  • Is Ted Kennedy’s Cancer Linked to Cell Phone Use?
  • Are wireless phones dangerous?
  • Listen! Cell Phones May Cause Brain Cancer
  • Are mobile towers safe?
  • Mobile Phone Use While Pregnant May Seriously Damage Unborn
  • Beware of Technology During Allergy Season
  • Cell phone tower proposal moved, neighbors resist
  • Scientists Agree That EMFs Pose a Threat to Your Health
  • Cell phone tower plan dropped
  • Cell Phone Tower Going Up On Man's Roof
  • Related Links
    · More about PHP-Nuke


    Most read story about PHP-Nuke:
    Some drivers ignoring cell phone law

    No TrackBacks Yet

    Theme design by Ethaidesign.com


    LU 911 and Military Tributes || LU Video News and Forum || Best Deal On Advertising Online || Cell Phone Radiation || Best Deal On Business Reviews