DNA Damage
SAR No Good!
What\'s Suggested
Product Comparison
Safe Phones
RF Safe Headsets
Belt Shields
Pocket Shields
Shopping Cart
Your cart is empty.

[ Browse ]
Product Categories
· Air Tube Headsets/Standard Headsets
· Ferrite Bead/ Wire Guard
· Headset Adapters
· Personal Shielding Protection
· Public Exposure Videos
· RF Safe Packages
· RFS Clothing
· RFS External Antennas
· RFS Meters
· STORE RETURN POLICY
Old Articles
BLoG Archives

Monday, June 23
·
Wednesday, June 18
· Possible health hazards from mobile phone radiation
Wednesday, June 11
· Teen insomnia linked to cellphone use
Monday, June 09
· Cell towers a health risk at Lodi schools?
Thursday, June 05
· Mobile Phones: Are They More Dangerous Than Smoking?
· Is Ted Kennedy’s Cancer Linked to Cell Phone Use?
Wednesday, June 04
· Are wireless phones dangerous?
Saturday, May 24
· Listen! Cell Phones May Cause Brain Cancer
· Are mobile towers safe?
· Mobile Phone Use While Pregnant May Seriously Damage Unborn
Sunday, May 04
· Beware of Technology During Allergy Season
· Cell phone tower proposal moved, neighbors resist
Friday, April 25
· Scientists Agree That EMFs Pose a Threat to Your Health
· Cell phone tower plan dropped
· Cell Phone Tower Going Up On Man's Roof
Thursday, April 10
· Will Your Cell Phone Kill You?
Saturday, April 05
· Cellphones more harmful than smoking
Friday, April 04
· Reducing Electromagnetic Frequency Exposure May Improve Your Health
Saturday, March 29
· Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age
Thursday, March 27
· Static over cell phone tower
Thursday, March 13
· The truth about using hands-free devices behind the wheel
Wednesday, January 16
· Where cancer-causing agents lurk
· Cell Phones Dangerous for Children
Thursday, January 10
· Cancer and mobile phones: the warnings are getting stronger
· Trumbull council OKs cell antenna
Sunday, January 06
· HEALTH: FRENCH MINISTRY SAYS NOT TO CELL PHONES FOR KIDS
Thursday, January 03
· Trumbull considers cell tower deal
Sunday, December 30
· Telcos get mixed signals about better reception
Wednesday, December 12
· Mobile phones increase the risk of tumours
Monday, December 10
· Bloomfield debates cell tower safety
Saturday, December 08
· New cell tower approved despite health concerns
Monday, December 03
· This stupid gadget doesn’t work and you shouldn’t buy it and it sucks
· Balloon test tabled
Saturday, December 01
· Cell Phones and Kids: Not a Safe Combination
Friday, November 30
· Cell tower still could happen
Wednesday, November 28
· Berkeley council takes no vote on cell-phone towers
· Group calls for limitations on cellular antennas
· Israeli Druse riot over installation of cell phone tower
· Beware cell phone users
Thursday, November 22
· Vaughan councillors call for cell tower plan
· Effects of Electropollution On Hormones and Breast Cancer
Saturday, September 22
· Mobile phone mast: Possible cause of cancer, fatigue
Thursday, September 20
· Lincolnshire head opposes phone mast
Wednesday, September 12
· Mobile industry holds its breath
· Irritable and sleepy? Blame your cellphone for it
Monday, September 10
· Mobile phone use and cancer linked
· Radiation clue to brain-cell damage by mobiles
· HEALTH RISK OF VILLAGE PHONE MAST SCHEME
Saturday, September 08
· Hold the Line: The Debate Over the Health Effects of Wireless
Friday, September 07
· Mobile Phone Radiation

Older Articles

www.bestdealon.com

BDO BLoG Archives

Keywords

Story Title Jefferson panel rejects cell tower
Keyword: rejects cell tower


Keywords powered by
BestDealOn.com
Previous Article Cell phone tower request rejected  ---  Next Article Mobile phones for children: Do we want them?
Jefferson panel rejects cell tower
PHP-Nuke

By Bill Pike

For the first time, an application to build a cellular-telephone tower in Jefferson County has been rejected.

Citing questions about need, the Louisville Metro Planning Commission voted 7-0 last week, with three abstentions, to deny a request by Elite Electrical Contractors to build a 180-foot tower at 7201 Global Drive, at the edge of Riverport.

 

The commission noted that Elite had not lined up any cell-phone providers to install equipment on the tower.

"The applicant needs to establish a need," commission member Donnie Blake said.

Jack Ruf, who handles cell-tower applications for Louisville Metro Planning & Design Services, told the commission that he couldn't recall any that did not identify providers who intended to use the tower.

Ruf said he was "dubious about the speculative nature of this tower," but he said a tower could ultimately be needed in the area.

Chris Ray, who owns Elite, said cell-phone service in the area is suffering and needs to be improved. He said that he would not construct a tower without a commitment from a provider and that there are no structures or buildings in the area tall enough to serve cell-phone equipment.

"We have to go outside to use the phone," Ray said of workers at his company, which has two office-warehouse buildings and plans a third on land that includes the proposed tower site.

Michael Harris, an engineer who worked on the application, said Ray has been negotiating with a provider but declined to identify the company.

Two residents objected to the tower.

Virginia Bowles, who said it would be less than 500 feet from her back yard on Burrice Court, likened it to "a giant erector set" and said she fears that the tower would produce radiation.

Nicki Hillerich, Bowles' next-door neighbor, said the tower would raise safety issues and would be used for radio transmissions if cell-phone providers didn't use it.

Harris said the tower would not pose a safety hazard because nearby homes would be outside its "fall radius." He also said that only cellular services would use the tower.

The commission's vote marked the first time it has rejected a tower since a change in state law gave it final say on the structures in 2002. The commission has approved 10 towers.

Before the law was changed, the state Public Service Commission had final say on cell-tower applications.

Commission spokesman Andrew Melnykovych said that after the agency began handling regulation in 1988, it approved 106 towers in Jefferson County, and there was no record it ever denied an application.

Ruf said the Planning Commission had wanted about six applications denied


Posted on Sunday, August 13 @ 18:29:20 UTC by admin
What do you think about this site?

Ummmm, not bad
Cool
Terrific
The best one!
I'm glad someone made it!



Results
Polls

Votes: 8705
Comments: 5
"Jefferson panel rejects cell tower" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register
AD
 
Options
Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

 Printer Friendly  Print as Text
 Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend

RELATED SEARCHES
rejects cell tower
Related News (Keyword Search)
  • Jefferson panel rejects cell tower

    Related News (Title Search)
  • Jefferson panel rejects cell tower
  • Related Links
    · More about PHP-Nuke


    Most read story about PHP-Nuke:
    Some drivers ignoring cell phone law

    No TrackBacks Yet

    Theme design by Ethaidesign.com


    LU 911 and Military Tributes || LU Video News and Forum || Best Deal On Advertising Online || Cell Phone Radiation || Best Deal On Business Reviews